Atomic content and the new learning architecture
How we can now move away from the course being the default unit of learning
I’m afraid far too many people in Learning & Development believe that their LMS needs to be filled with content to be successful.
In fact, I’ve come across many situations where, to justify the expense made on the LMS, every piece of content (including videos) gets packaged as SCORM and imported as a course.
And then they wonder why no one is using their content?
As soon as you put your content into a SCORM package you severely limit how people will get to it. Yes, your LMS might have a search engine, but it will only find the title, and maybe some descriptive text if you’re lucky. It will not search inside the package.
Similarly, your LMS might have a catalogue, but that’s not going to help anyone find and quickly navigate to the materials inside your SCORM packages.
For content to be used and useful, I would suggest it should have two characteristics:
If you'd like to discuss this article, or how I can help you, get in touch.
Posted: 09 June 2017
Tags: Content management Information architecture Solution design
How we can now move away from the course being the default unit of learning
With the rise of the AI content creation tools, do we still need elearning authoring software?
A dive into this new technology
From amorphous blob to a practical plan
Three options for retaining control of distributed content
How to get started